Workspace / Pawston Cat Foods
Target setting hub

Targets

Set science-based reduction targets and track live progress against your latest inventory. Aligned to SBTi, CSRD, and custom frameworks.

1
On track
1
At risk
1
Off track
42% absolute reduction by 2030
SBTi near-term (1.5°C)
On track
42% reduction in All scopes (1+2+3) by 2030
20%
to target
2024On-pace · 17%2030
Currently 11,780 tCO₂e (8.3% from baseline of 12,847 tCO₂e)
Scope 1+2 near-term reduction
SBTi near-term (1.5°C)
At risk
42% reduction in Scope 1+2 by 2030
5%
to target
2024On-pace · 17%2030
Currently 2,985 tCO₂e (2.1% from baseline of 3,050 tCO₂e)
Supplier engagement target
Supplier engagement
67% of suppliers by spend with SBTs by 2027
Progress unavailable, no current-year inventory yet.

Progress tracking updates automatically as new inventory data is processed. Targets are read-only in the demo; in a live workspace, an owner or your carbon accountant sets them.

Reduction roadmap

Pawston Cat Foods Ltd

Prioritised decarbonisation actions ranked by impact and effort, each tied to a specific category or supplier in your footprint.

Year 3 target (SBTi-aligned)

Where you should be by year 3 if you're on a 1.5°C-aligned reduction path (~4.2% per year absolute).

10.2k
tCO₂e
Total reduction potential

Sum of all recommended actions vs. business-as-usual: the full reduction available if every recommendation is executed.

2.6k
tCO₂e
Impact vs Effort

Each dot is a recommended action. Top-right = high reduction potential and high effort; top-left = the obvious early wins. Sized by materiality.

Reduction waterfall

How each action chips into your baseline. Read left-to-right to see the path from today's footprint to the year-3 target.

All Recommendations (8)

How these are generated: we group your activity records by emissions category, match each category to a published reduction benchmark (Carbon Trust, BEIS, IEA), then apply that benchmark's typical saving to your actual emissions in that category. Effort and timeline come from the benchmark. Recommendations are ranked by estimated saving. Categories without an established benchmark are left out rather than guessed at.

ActionTypeCurrent tCO₂eReductionEffortTimelineResources
Switch to a certified renewable electricity tariffenergy1.8k1.5kt (80.0%)lowQuick win
Transition fleet to electric/hybrid vehiclestransport450.0225.0t (50.0%)highStrategic
Engage key suppliers to collect actual emission data and identify alternativesprocurement2.2k218.0t (10.0%)mediumMedium term
Engage key suppliers to collect actual emission data and identify alternativesprocurement2.0k202.0t (10.0%)mediumMedium term
Engage key suppliers to collect actual emission data and identify alternativesprocurement1.7k165.0t (10.0%)mediumMedium term
Engage key suppliers to collect actual emission data and identify alternativesprocurement1.4k142.0t (10.0%)mediumMedium term
Improve heating efficiency (insulation, controls, heat pump feasibility study)energy760.0114.0t (15.0%)mediumMedium term
Implement waste reduction and recycling programmeoperations240.060.0t (25.0%)mediumMedium term

Ranked by estimated emissions saving. Effort and timeline estimates are indicative. Your analyst will confirm before implementation begins.

What-if scenarios

Model what-if scenarios before committing capital. Compare fleet electrification, supplier switches, and energy transitions side by side.

Green electricity tariff

calculated

Move the Wolverhampton production site to 100% renewable electricity via National Grid.

Changes applied
Replace emission source
Scope 2: replace grid electricity with a REGO-backed renewable tariff
In a live workspace, a calculated scenario can be converted straight into a tracked reduction target. Read-only in the demo.
Impact by scope
Top categories
Purchased grid electricity1,840 t1,128 t-39%
Purchased goods: dairy2,180 t2,180 t
Purchased goods: meat & poultry2,020 t2,020 t
calculated
Baseline
12,847 t
Scenario
11,403 t
-11.2%(-1,444 tCO₂e)
2 changes defined
calculated
Baseline
12,847 t
Scenario
12,135 t
-5.5%(-712 tCO₂e)
1 change defined
draft
3 changes defined
Available presets
Scenarios are read-only in the demo. In a live workspace, analysts and admins can create custom scenarios, calculate their impact against the current baseline, and convert calculated scenarios into reduction targets.

Peer benchmarks

How your organisation compares to peers in the same sector, revenue band, and geography. Cohorts respect strict k-anonymity and use only data from organisations reporting under the same methodology version.

Peer comparisons appear once at least six peers have published. This sample shows a filled cohort.

Benchmark

Where you sit

Compared to 7 peers, UK methodology v1

Emissions per employee
7 peers
Bottom 25%
58.00 t / FTE
Median
72.00 t / FTE
Top 25%
91.00 t / FTE
You: 71.00 t / FTE
Emissions per £M revenue
7 peers
Bottom 25%
410.00 t / £M
Median
540.00 t / £M
Top 25%
700.00 t / £M
You: 535.00 t / £M
Cohort: SIC 10 · Manufacture of food products · United Kingdom · £10M to £25M revenue · Scope 1+2+3 · UK methodology v1 · 7 peers
H
Your Hemera analyst
Message us