Workspace / Pawston Cat Foods
Analyst signed
Get started
Methodology·v4 — awaiting sign-offEngine·v0.3Emission factors·DEFRA UK GHG 2024Last sign-off·22 Apr 2026Audit chain·✓ verified
Pawston Cat Foods Ltd

Insights

FY2025

Narrative insights generated from your inventory data — trend detection, anomaly flags, and year-on-year comparisons.

Total emissions
12,847
tCO₂e · 95% CI 11,203 14,491
Scope 3 share
59.9%
of total inventory from the value chain
Gap to SBTi 1.5°C
+-324
tCO₂e above the 2025 aligned pathway
Year-on-year change · FY2024 → FY2025

What pushed emissions up, what pushed them down, and the net change between the two reporting years.

0.0k7.4k14.7k14.0k-620-340-280+7612.8k
FY2024
Dairy procurement switch
Route optimisation
Green tariff migration
Production volume growth
FY2025
AnchorReductionIncreaseNet change 8.3%(-1,164 tCO₂e)
Net change: -8.3% (-1,164 tCO₂e).
Trajectory · actual vs baseline scenario vs SBTi 1.5°C

Your actual emissions plotted against business-as-usual and a 1.5°C-aligned pathway. The gap is the reduction still to find.

8.0k10.3k12.5k14.8k17.0k1.5°C goal · 2031Baseline20242026202820302031
ActualBaseline scenario · BAUSBTi 1.5°C trajectoryGOAL2033 target value
Uncertainty narrowing as primary data climbs

As suppliers share measured data, the confidence interval on your footprint tightens. This chart shows that link in motion.

1.651.4040%5%Apr 2024Oct 2024Mar 2025
Uncertainty% primary data
Uncertainty fell from 1.61 to 1.42 as primary data share grew from 9% to 38%. Each engaged supplier tightens the inventory.
Materiality × uncertainty · priority sources

Where each emission source sits on a map of size (how big it is) versus uncertainty (how confident we are). Top-right needs work first.

Hover any source for the breakdown.
1.01.41.82.20%5%10%20%30%5%PRIORITYMateriality (% of footprint) →Uncertainty (GSD) →
Scope 1Scope 2Scope 3Materiality thresholdUncertainty reference (1.5)Dot size · absolute emissions
Prioritisation list · TACA threshold toggle

The same sources, ranked. Switch the threshold to see which sources stay in scope under stricter materiality rules.

Sources ≥ 5% of total·5 sources in scope·80.3% of footprint
#Source% shareCumul.Uncert.Recommended action
  • 01Purchased ingredients — dairy & meatScope 332.9%32.9%1.38Review · within tolerance
  • 02Outbound logistics (3PL)Scope 316.8%49.7%1.51Upgrade pedigree · target tier 2
  • 03Business travel & employee commutingScope 312.7%62.4%1.67Upgrade pedigree · target tier 2
  • 04Fleet diesel — delivery vansScope 19.4%71.8%1.18Maintain · already verified
  • 05Purchased ingredients — produceScope 38.5%80.3%1.29Maintain · already verified
5 of 5 sources captured · 10,310 tCO₂e in scopeGHG Protocol allows excluding sources up to 5% cumulative when documented.
Analyst insights
Scope 3 dominates your footprint

Your value chain accounts for 59.9% of total emissions. Purchased goods (dairy & meat) and outbound logistics are the two largest categories.

Fleet electrification opportunity

Switching the delivery fleet to EVs could cut Scope 1 by ~70% (≈ 843 tCO₂e). Payback period estimated at 30 months given current diesel costs.

Year-on-year reduction on track

Total emissions fell 8.3% vs FY2024 baseline, driven by the Slough green tariff switch and route consolidation.

Employee commuting data gap

Commuting estimates use DEFRA averages — a staff travel survey would improve accuracy and may lower the figure by 15–20%.

Insights drafted by the lead analyst, reviewed before publishing · figures computed from the live inventory · methodology v1.0.0 · engine v0.3.0 · all figures hover-traceable to source records.
Last computed: 2 minutes ago