Riverside Court
Office · EPC D · published · control basis: operational · 2,600 m²
What the numbers say
Tenant energy in leased space is effectively this building's entire footprint — Riverside Retail Co alone is 59% of it. The lever here is tenant engagement, not the landlord's own operations.
Benchmark-estimated tenancies sit at rung 5. They are not GRESB-eligible and widen the uncertainty band — a tenant data request climbs the ladder.
The footprint is rising — worth decomposing before the next reporting cycle. See the trend chart below.
Footprint by GHG category
All 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories, in order. Categories 9–12 and 14 are not applicable to a CRE owner — the UKGBC guide marks them out.
Provenance — how 13.5 tCO₂e is derived
| Record | kWh | Emission factor | Rung | tCO₂e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Retail Co Electricity · CIBSE TM46 benchmark · floor-area estimate | 38,200 | DEFRA 2024 — UK electricity 0.2068 kgCO₂e/kWh | Rung 5 | 7.9 |
| Harbour Books Electricity · CIBSE TM46 benchmark · floor-area estimate | 27,100 | DEFRA 2024 — UK electricity 0.2066 kgCO₂e/kWh | Rung 5 | 5.6 |
| Total | 13.5 | |||
Each record = activity quantity (kWh) × a pinned DEFRA emission factor. Records are append-only; corrections supersede, never overwrite.
Uncertainty — each record carries a tier-based σ (log-space); a correlated Monte Carlo (5,000 iterations) produces the 95% band 9.9–18.4 tCO₂e.
Method — HemeraScope asset-v1, UKGBC Table 4 accuracy ladder. Reproducible: the same inputs replay to the same number.
Trace every kgCO₂e back to the exact emission factor row, version and vintage it came from — plus any analyst override that altered the calculated number.
Footprint over time
Up 14.4% since 2022 — driven by rising occupancy; intensity per m² is the fairer read while the building fills.
Tenancies — Cat 13 downstream leased assets
| Tenant | Demised | Energy | Data quality | tCO₂e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Riverside Retail Co | 800 m² | Tenant-procured | Rung 5 — industry benchmark | 7.9 |
| Harbour Books | 700 m² | Tenant-procured | Rung 5 — industry benchmark | 5.6 |
| Unit 1 — vacant | 1,100 m² | Landlord-procured | Vacant — not let | — |
Methodology & disclosure
Tenant energy resolved at Rung 5 — industry benchmark by floor area on the UKGBC Table 4 accuracy ladder.
Relevant Scope 3 activities & how to collect the data
- ▸Use actual tenant energy data where readily available.
- ▸Where not, apply the tenant-energy estimation ladder (UKGBC Table 4).
- ▸Request a spend breakdown for the reporting year from procurement, by category/supplier.
- ▸Subtract spend already reported under energy or upstream transport.
- ▸Use spend data to split operating vs capital costs.
- ▸Ask finance for capital goods with acquisition dates.
- ▸Take the electricity and fuel figures already in the Scope 1 & 2 footprint.
- ▸Pull mode, distance and class from the central travel-booking system.
- ▸Request waste quantity by disposal route from waste collectors and landlords.
- ▸Tenant waste is excluded from the boundary by default (optional for GRESB).