Pawston House
Office · EPC B · published · control basis: operational · 4,000 m²
What the numbers say
Tenant energy in leased space is effectively this building's entire footprint — Maple & Finch Solicitors alone is 48% of it. The lever here is tenant engagement, not the landlord's own operations.
Every tenancy reports on rung 1 (actual data) — the whole footprint is GRESB-eligible and the uncertainty band is tight.
A genuine downward trend — see the year-on-year chart below for the split between operational improvement and one-off effects.
Footprint by GHG category
All 15 GHG Protocol Scope 3 categories, in order. Categories 9–12 and 14 are not applicable to a CRE owner — the UKGBC guide marks them out.
Provenance — how 134.5 tCO₂e is derived
| Record | kWh | Emission factor | Rung | tCO₂e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple & Finch Solicitors Electricity · Tenant portal submission · evidence attached | 313,000 | DEFRA 2024 — UK electricity 0.2070 kgCO₂e/kWh | Rung 1 | 64.8 |
| Northgate Media Electricity · Tenant portal submission · evidence attached | 273,400 | DEFRA 2024 — UK electricity 0.2070 kgCO₂e/kWh | Rung 1 | 56.6 |
| Common parts Gas · Landlord utility bill · extracted | 168,500 | DEFRA 2024 — natural gas 0.0777 kgCO₂e/kWh | Rung 1 | 13.1 |
| Total | 134.5 | |||
Each record = activity quantity (kWh) × a pinned DEFRA emission factor. Records are append-only; corrections supersede, never overwrite.
Uncertainty — each record carries a tier-based σ (log-space); a correlated Monte Carlo (5,000 iterations) produces the 95% band 121.0–149.8 tCO₂e.
Method — HemeraScope asset-v1, UKGBC Table 4 accuracy ladder. Reproducible: the same inputs replay to the same number.
Trace every kgCO₂e back to the exact emission factor row, version and vintage it came from — plus any analyst override that altered the calculated number.
Footprint over time
Down 11.5% since 2022 — a steady operational improvement as tenant energy is measured and reduced, not a one-off.
Tenancies — Cat 13 downstream leased assets
| Tenant | Demised | Energy | Data quality | tCO₂e |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Maple & Finch Solicitors | 1,600 m² | Landlord-procured | Rung 1 — actual tenant data | 64.8 |
| Northgate Media | 1,500 m² | Landlord-procured | Rung 1 — actual tenant data | 56.6 |
| Unit 3 — vacant | 900 m² | Landlord-procured | Vacant — not let | — |
Methodology & disclosure
Tenant energy resolved at Rung 1 — actual tenant data on the UKGBC Table 4 accuracy ladder.
Relevant Scope 3 activities & how to collect the data
- ▸Use actual tenant energy data where readily available.
- ▸Where not, apply the tenant-energy estimation ladder (UKGBC Table 4).
- ▸Request a spend breakdown for the reporting year from procurement, by category/supplier.
- ▸Subtract spend already reported under energy or upstream transport.
- ▸Use spend data to split operating vs capital costs.
- ▸Ask finance for capital goods with acquisition dates.
- ▸Take the electricity and fuel figures already in the Scope 1 & 2 footprint.
- ▸Pull mode, distance and class from the central travel-booking system.
- ▸Request waste quantity by disposal route from waste collectors and landlords.
- ▸Tenant waste is excluded from the boundary by default (optional for GRESB).